Oh, Bravo! Federal Reserve's Mind-Boggling Attempt to Protect Minorities While Gentrifying Communities Simultaneously
The plan is treat everyone different but the same, while making ghettos rich places.
Protecting poor & minorities while gentrifying communities, the same time?
The Federal Reserve, in collaboration with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), is taking steps to address fair lending risks associated with digital marketing activities.
In a recent webinar on fair lending supervision, the Federal Reserve highlighted the potential for digital redlining, which involves using certain criteria to exclude minority communities or minority applicants from marketing efforts.
Technology is making it more expensive to get a house and appraisers are beating down prices if they don’t like the area and consider it negative.
1. Digital Redlining: The use of digital marketing activities to exclude majority minority communities or minority applications is a potential fair lending risk. This practice can result in limited access to financial services and opportunities for certain communities based on their race or ethnicity.
2. Reverse Redlining or Steering: New technologies can lead to reverse redlining or steering, where more expensive or inferior products are advertised to minority communities. This can result in these communities being targeted with less favorable financial products and services, potentially leading to financial disadvantages.
3. Changes in CRA Regulations: The proposed adaptation of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations to address changes in the banking sector, including internet and mobile banking, may impact consumers. Depending on the specific changes, it could affect the accessibility and availability of banking services for certain communities.
4. Deficient Home Appraisals: The risks associated with deficient home appraisals can negatively impact consumers. Inaccuracies in collateral valuations due to errors, omissions, or discrimination can affect borrowers' ability to access fair loans and obtain suitable housing options.
Stop! Are we kidding? It’s very real.
This practice can perpetuate discrimination and limit access to financial services for marginalized groups.New technologies also present the risk of reverse redlining or steering, whereby more expensive or inferior products are advertised to minority communities.
This can result in these communities being targeted with products that may not be in their best interest, exacerbating existing inequalities in the financial sector.
To address these concerns, the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC are working together to release a final rule for the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The CRA aims to ensure that banks meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, particularly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
The proposed rule will adapt the regulations to account for changes in the banking sector, such as the rise of internet and mobile banking, and update the approach to assessment areas.In addition to the CRA rule, the agencies have invited public comment on guidance that would highlight risks associated with deficient home appraisals.
**As prices rise, even if people have bad credit or debts, they’ll be favored for help.
Make Poor Neighborhoods Rich They Say
Deficient collateral valuations can contain inaccuracies due to errors, omissions, or even discrimination. By addressing these risks, the agencies aim to promote fair lending practices and ensure that all individuals, regardless of their background, have equal access to financial services.
It is important to note that while the efforts to address fair lending risks are commendable, there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of the CRA and the proposed rule. Critics argue that the CRA has not been successful in achieving its intended goals and that it may burden banks with unnecessary compliance requirements.
They suggest that alternative approaches, such as market-based solutions, may be more effective in promoting fair lending.
On the other hand, proponents of the CRA argue that it has played a crucial role in expanding access to credit for underserved communities.
They believe that updating the regulations to account for digital banking and other changes in the industry is necessary to ensure the continued effectiveness of the CRA.
So the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC are taking steps to address fair lending risks associated with digital marketing activities. The proposed changes to the CRA regulations and the guidance on deficient home appraisals aim to promote fair lending practices and equal access to financial services.
However, there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of these measures, with critics suggesting alternative approaches and proponents highlighting the importance of the CRA in expanding access to credit.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Tweetsift Report to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.